K.D.Welast at t-online.de ()
2006-10-11 13:24:05 UTC
Hello Karl,
[.....]
increase to >the max number of file handle for omniNames and onmiNames
stalled.
Sorry, for that mistake!
I mean we reduce the number of new connetion by increase the interval
time.
Best regards
Mit freundlichen Gr??en
Kl. D. Welast
Hellersberstr. 35A
41460 Neuss
Tel: +49 2131 166657
Mobil: +49 171 5638203
Email: ***@t-online.de
[.....]
In our case the limitation of max file handle (256 per default) caused
the stall >of omniNames.omniNames close the socket related file handle after a timeout (I can?t
remember who long the timeout was). If your interval for new connection
is >shorter then the timeout period, the number of open files handlesremember who long the timeout was). If your interval for new connection
increase to >the max number of file handle for omniNames and onmiNames
stalled.
In our production environment we reduce the interval of new connection
to >solve the problem.Sorry, for that mistake!
I mean we reduce the number of new connetion by increase the interval
time.
Best regards
Mit freundlichen Gr??en
Kl. D. Welast
Hellersberstr. 35A
41460 Neuss
Tel: +49 2131 166657
Mobil: +49 171 5638203
Email: ***@t-online.de